<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Too Much Skunk In Your Junk &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skunkgal.com/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skunkgal.com</link>
	<description>For the frivolous-minded only.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>vaccines, jenny mccarthy, playboy</title>
		<link>http://www.skunkgal.com/2009/05/vaccines-jenny-mccarthy-playboy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skunkgal.com/2009/05/vaccines-jenny-mccarthy-playboy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skunkgal.com/?p=1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jenny mccarthy is an anti-vaccine advocate (vaccine critic?). people like her who don&#8217;t vaccinate their children are stupid and are a threat to the populace, but what really pisses me off about this whole mccarthy/vaccine thing is the way mccarthy (who, i repeat, is totally wrong) is often described in articles: discover: It has had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jenny mccarthy is an anti-vaccine advocate (vaccine critic?). people like her who don&#8217;t vaccinate their children are stupid and are a threat to the populace, but what really pisses me off about this whole mccarthy/vaccine thing is the way mccarthy (who, i repeat, is totally wrong) is often described in articles:</p>
<p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2009/jun/06-why-does-vaccine-autism-controversy-live-on" target="new">discover</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It has had a particularly strong life on the Internet, including the heavily trafficked Huffington Post, and in pop culture, where it is supported by actors including Charlie Sheen and Jim Carrey, former <strong>Playboy playmate</strong> Jenny McCarthy, and numerous others. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2217798/" target="new">slate</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jenny McCarthy begs to differ. McCarthy dropped out of nursing school in 1993 <strong>to become a Playboy bunny</strong> and later starred in an MTV show that focused on her bodily functions. She believes that vaccines made her 7-year-old son autistic—and that she &#8220;recovered&#8221; him with alternative therapies, as she details in her parenting books.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1888718,00.html?iid=digg_share" target="new">time</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>There was not much in Jenny McCarthy&#8217;s early career as a Playboy model and MTV star to suggest that she would become a passionate advocate for family issues, children&#8217;s health and autism awareness.</strong> </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/AutismNews/Story?id=5483159&#038;page=1" target="new">abc news</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Amy Pisani, executive director of ECBT, says she hopes Peet&#8217;s advocacy is &#8220;a 100 percent antidote&#8221; to the position of former <strong>Playboy model </strong>Jenny McCarthy&#8217;s position that the current vaccine schedule places children at a higher risk of developing autism. </p></blockquote>
<p>shockingly, <a href="http://health.usnews.com/blogs/heart-to-heart/2009/04/14/the-vaccines-autism-war-dtente-needed.html" target="new">usnews</a>, the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2008/09/whose-side-are.html" target="new">latimes</a>, and the<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/09/30/2008-09-30_jenny_mccarthy_and_amanda_peet_duke_it_o.html" target="new"> ny daily news</a> manage to write a story about jenny mccarthy without mentioning her playboy stint <em>16 years ago</em>. </p>
<p>the time and discover descriptions are the worst of the bunch. why do jim carrey and charlie sheen not have descriptors in front of their names besides &#8220;actors?&#8221; i believe mccarthy can accurately be described as an &#8220;actress&#8221; right now, and it sounds like the author is mostly amusing himself by being able to get &#8220;playboy&#8221; into his science piece. if the writer wants to kill the credibility of all celebrity anti-vaxxers, why doesn&#8217;t sheen get the the hit job treatment either? i do believe he was a loyal heidi fleiss customer and a coke addict, making him a pretty shitty authority on vaccines.</p>
<p>the time one is even more stupid. a playboy playmate can&#8217;t ever become a &#8220;passionate advocate for family issues, children&#8217;s health and autism awareness?&#8221; even if they&#8217;re having children 16 years after they were a model? women who do dumb things when they&#8217;re young can&#8217;t ever be expected to become good moms later? things change when people grow up and have kids. not that surprising.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s perfectly valid to point out mccarthy has a credibility problem. she&#8217;s not a scientist, a doctor, or anything that gives her any authority to talk about a public health issue like wide-scale vaccination. it&#8217;s even ok to call her &#8220;just an actress&#8221; (which is what she is, right now). but her occupation in 1993 is pretty irrelevant, and it&#8217;s just another annoying way that women&#8217;s sexuality gets woven into unrelated narratives. just another way to snicker at women that men don&#8217;t have to deal with.</p>
<p>/feminist rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skunkgal.com/2009/05/vaccines-jenny-mccarthy-playboy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.205 seconds -->
