john edwards: why?
August 8, 2008, 6:34 pm
kinda sucks. but i have some logistical questions and comments.
1. i’m trying to construct a timeline here:
sometime in 2006: edwards and hunter meet
november 2006: eliz edwards’s cancer goes into remission
march 22, 2007: eliz edwards’s cancer comes back. also, john edwards says he was no longer having an affair after her cancer came back
may 2007: hunter’s baby is conceived
july 2007: if the national enquirer is correct, this is the earliest the affair ended (18 months)
february 2008: hunter’s baby is born
now, something here is not right. if the enquirer is correct, then edwards is lying about the when he was banging that chickie, and it is completely possible the baby is his. the other less awesome possibility is that the enquirer is wrong about the length of the affair.
2. i care about this a lot less than this analysis suggests. i was just trying to do the math and it wasn’t adding up, i swear.
3. do i think the liberal media f’d this one up? oh hell yes. way to show your true colors and make this whole enterprise harder to defend. someone explain the state of journalism to me when the national enquirer is breaking one of the hugest political stories of the year. ugh.
4. how is it that this 42yo hard-partying “filmmaker” can bag two married men in such a short amount of time? how and why? and i really want to see a pic of this andrew young fella, just out of sheer voyeuristic curiosity.
4. in any case, i really don’t like you, john edwards, b/c you sue people like my mom and seriously threaten my inheritance. and you cheat on your dying wife, who is dying b/c she was trying to have more of your lecherous babies. and your hair is too nice. i’m so over it.