what is this “tendency to molest children” nonsense? how do you find out someone has a tendency if he hasn’t already done it, thus making him a child molester already? is there some sort of preemptive personality quiz?
if you read the story, it becomes clear the headline writer was trying to make a distinction between pedophile priests and gay priests (little boys = really bad; men = ehhh, we’ll work on it later). the guy/gal who wrote this didn’t do a great job …

Tags: headlines, new york times | Comments (0)